铅超标吃什么排铅

If you care about wrongful convictions then this podcast is a must listen

I would have hoped that is accepted practice by now…. if you know that the audio you are getting from archival source is going to be inaudible, and you’re not able to clean it to a acceptable level, then please please please… You have to repeat and clarify what is being said on the recording for your audience. We are completely lost otherwise. And if there’s a question of whether it is clear or not, that means it is not clear enough. I’m listening to episode 12 seven minutes in and it’s probably one of the most important interviews of the series and I have no idea what is being said.

When a podcast’s first episode is telling you all about how this is a wrongful conviction before even laying out the basic facts of the case, you know it’s trash. The interpretation and analysis should come after presenting the evidence, allowing listeners to form their own interpretation. This felt incredibly heavy-handed, more like a release from the guy’s legal team than anything else. The writer here needs to be less obvious with their agenda

Great job with this!